View Full Version : 100 Grand for womens bathrooms in firehouses
WRESTLINGFAN
12-27-2011, 10:31 AM
Nothing ceases to amaze me on what some congresswhore wants to do with federal money.
Before anyone cries sexism here's my problem with it. Fire depts are locally funded thru property taxes. Why should people in other states subsidize this. Now if municipalities want to bring this up for a vote then theres no issue.
If this goes thru its a slippery slope. Whats next ? Bathrooms and showers for gays?
Also a bathroom can be made to suit a womans needs for less than 100k
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/201337-house-dem-proposes-federal-grants-to-build-womens-restrooms-in-fire-stations
Snacks
12-27-2011, 10:39 AM
I have no problem with them making every firehouse have 2 bathrooms. I dont understand why a toilet sink and shower would, could or should cost up to $100,000? Thats a problem and that is why so many people hate politics and govt spending. Something that could cost a few grand cost 10 x that or more because the govt is paying for it?
Fire jobs should go to all those who are qualified. Color nor sex should matter and the fire house should work well for all working there. That being said there should be standard testing across the board. No grading curves for skin color and no fitness curves for sex.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-27-2011, 11:35 AM
I have no problem with them making every firehouse have 2 bathrooms. I dont understand why a toilet sink and shower would, could or should cost up to $100,000? Thats a problem and that is why so many people hate politics and govt spending. Something that could cost a few grand cost 10 x that or more because the govt is paying for it?
Fire jobs should go to all those who are qualified. Color nor sex should matter and the fire house should work well for all working there. That being said there should be standard testing across the board. No grading curves for skin color and no fitness curves for sex.
Agreed to those points but build those bathrooms with local funds. Someone in Philly shouldnt pay for toilet stalls in Chicago
underdog
12-27-2011, 11:38 AM
I have no idea why I'm responding, but what the fuck...
It says up to $100k. It's also for a full locker room :
Rep. Laura Richardson (D-Calif.) has proposed legislation that would let fire stations around the country apply for grants of up to $100,000 to build women's restrooms, showers and changing facilities.
A large fire station might need to build a large locker room for the ladies.
I await your response to my post that will have nothing to do with what I posted.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-27-2011, 11:49 AM
I must have not posted that I want any upgrades provided by local funds. Shame on me.
A locker room might run in excess of 50K if it semi resembles the Yankees clubhouse. Should we provide flat screen TV's and plush couches and huge lockers for the ladies?
How about slots to put their purses in the lockers while we are at it, Hell lets allow more room for shoes
I dont believe that 2 sinks 2 stalls and a community shower is going to cost so much
WRESTLINGFAN
12-27-2011, 12:00 PM
I did a search to see how many female firemen there are in NYC one of the largest in the country.
According to the article from huff post not eve 1% out of a total force of over 11k
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/07/brenda-berkman-women-9-11_n_951726.html
NYC Has 5 boros and most likely those women are scattered throughout the city
Snacks
12-27-2011, 12:08 PM
I have no idea why I'm responding, but what the fuck...
It says up to $100k. It's also for a full locker room :
A large fire station might need to build a large locker room for the ladies.
I await your response to my post that will have nothing to do with what I posted.
if you are talking to me then I did mention " up to" i never said they would all cost that much but not 1 should cost that much. Is there really need for full locker rooms? Do men have full locker rooms or just shower stales with some school lockers? There isnt a firehouse in the country that would have that many women working at 1 time. If a firehouse has 100 firemen (which is a lot more then I think any 1 firehouse would have) maybe 5 would be women.
My town has about 70 firemen total with close to 100,000 resident and we have 3 firehouses. Thats a total of 23 per house. they could add a full addition to the firehouses for less then $100k.
Nothing ceases to amaze me on what some congresswhore wants to do with federal money.
Before anyone cries sexism here's my problem with it. Fire depts are locally funded thru property taxes. Why should people in other states subsidize this. Now if municipalities want to bring this up for a vote then theres no issue.
If this goes thru its a slippery slope. Whats next ? Bathrooms and showers for gays?
Also a bathroom can be made to suit a womans needs for less than 100k
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/201337-house-dem-proposes-federal-grants-to-build-womens-restrooms-in-fire-stations
Congresswhore? Could you be anymore disrespectful to women?
This once again fits into the WF mantra that if he can't put his dick into a person, said person has no societal value.
Fucking idiot.
And of course, Congresswoman Laura Richardson is brown.
WF is so fucking predictable that it makes me sick.
http://www.modernizeaid.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Rep.-Laura-Richardson.jpg
WRESTLINGFAN
12-27-2011, 12:14 PM
Congresswhore? Could you be anymore disrespectful to women?
This once again fits into the WF mantra that if he can't put his dick into a person, said person has no societal value.
Fucking idiot.
I await your outrage at all those sexist lines on Sarah Palin. Next time you hear someone call her Caribou Barbie or when Bill Maher calls her a stewardess you tell him a thing or 2.
Fucking selective outrage is amazing here
WRESTLINGFAN
12-27-2011, 12:16 PM
And of course, Congresswoman Laura Richardson is brown.
WF is so fucking predictable that it makes me sick.
http://www.modernizeaid.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Rep.-Laura-Richardson.jpg
She would be a fucking dope if she was white. Why must you bring race into everything. Pelosi falls into that category but fuck it, I hate people of Italian background too right?
Mitt Romney is not my guy. I hate mormons according to your logic.
Your lines of racism are getting old.
I await your outrage at all those lines on Sarah Palin. Next time you hear someone call her Caribou Barbie or when Bill Maher calls her a stewardess you tell him a thing or 2.
Fucking selective outrage is amazing here
That's right, let's play the "two wrongs make a right card"! If that's your only defense then you are a sorry son of a bitch.
Your continued pattern of racism and sexism on this board is unfucking believable. Consistently you spew bullshit, and always "amazingly" manage to go after brown people.
Your gimmick is sad and pathetic.
She would be a fucking dope if she was white. Why must you bring race into everything. Pelosi falls into that category but fuck it, I hate people of Italian background too right?
I'm sorry, I'm not the one with the pattern of going after brown people and I'm not the one who unnecessarily called a sitting member of Congress a "congresswhore".
If you would've bothered to create a discussion about government regulation without your lowlife rhetoric I might be able to accept you as a semi-serious person.
Instead you are who you are, a low-life racist troll.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-27-2011, 12:22 PM
That's right, let's play the "two wrongs make a right card"! If that's your only defense then you are a sorry son of a bitch.
Your continued pattern of racism and sexism on this board is unfucking believable. Consistently you spew bullshit, and always "amazingly" manage to go after brown people.
Your gimmick is sad and pathetic.
Like I've never gone after white politicians that I disagree with including some in the GOP ?
I have criticized Newt, McCain and others
Like I've never gone after white politicians that I disagree with including some in the GOP ?
I have criticized Newt, McCain and others
So when exactly did you call Senator John McCain a "congresswhore"?
WRESTLINGFAN
12-27-2011, 12:25 PM
I'm sorry, I'm not the one with the pattern of going after brown people and I'm not the one who unnecessarily called a sitting member of Congress a "congresswhore".
If you would've bothered to create a discussion about government regulation without your lowlife rhetoric I might be able to accept you as a semi-serious person.
Instead you are who you are, a low-life racist troll.
There were much worse things said about the previous preident and VP which were much worse. I happened to agree with some of them.
Do you want to debate this topic or stick to semantics and arguing about some congresswomans race?
There were much worse things said about the previous preident and VP which were much worse. I happened to agree with some of them.
Do you want to debate this topic or stick to semantics and arguing about some congresswomans race?
Once again you play the "two wrongs make a right card" and can't justify your bullshit.
Just admit it, you were wrong and showed us exactly who you are...a racist asshole.
I'm sure you've got plenty of friends over at stormfront.org who take your side on this pressing bathroom regulation issue.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-27-2011, 12:36 PM
Once again you play the "two wrongs make a right card" and can't justify your bullshit.
Just admit it, you were wrong and showed us exactly who you are...a racist asshole.
I'm sure you've got plenty of friends over at stormfront.org who take your side on this pressing bathroom regulation issue.
Tell me where I dropped the N word and I will admit it.
You got nothing you just throw that word around when you cant even debate the issue. Opposing the federal government paying for women to shit shower and shave isnt racism. The woman is a fucking idiot who knows nothing about how police/fire depts are funded
Stick to posting how many signatures there are to recall Scott Walker youre better at that sir.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-27-2011, 12:43 PM
It has nothing to do with 2 wrongs dont make a right. When Bill Maher said things about Sarah Palin im sure you were the 1st one laughing Epo.
But since youre obsessed with semantics. Ill also give you 2 words literal and figurative,
Almost every politician is a whore meaning they will sell themselves out for campaign cash from everything to ethnic front groups, wall st, mega multinational corporations and defense contractors.
Debate the topic and defend her silly legislation
Tell me where I dropped the N word and I will admit it.
You got nothing you just throw that word around when you cant even debate the issue. Opposing the federal government paying for women to shit shower and shave isnt racism. The woman is a fucking idiot who knows nothing about how police/fire depts are funded
Stick to posting how many signatures there are to recall Scott Walker youre better at that sir.
Just because someone doesn't use the "N-Word" doesn't mean that they aren't racist assholes.
And yes "Scott Walker"....red herring it up! How about I add a red herring for you....Why don't you go read some nice Ron Paul Report racist newsletters? I'm sure they are your cup of tea.
It has nothing to do with 2 wrongs dont make a right. When Bill Maher said things about Sarah Palin im sure you were the 1st one laughing Epo.
Strawman.
You really are boring and pathetic.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-27-2011, 12:57 PM
Just because someone doesn't use the "N-Word" doesn't mean that they aren't racist assholes.
And yes "Scott Walker"....red herring it up! How about I add a red herring for you....Why don't you go read some nice Ron Paul Report racist newsletters? I'm sure they are your cup of tea.
Wanna play that card speaking of old items. Go listen to a Jeremiah Wright Sermon just like you he hates Jews,
ANTI SEMITE
WRESTLINGFAN
12-27-2011, 12:59 PM
Can we lock this thread if this cant be on topic?
Ive asked you to debate me on the topic and if you agree with her. Defend it
Can we lock this thread if this cant be on topic?
Ive asked you to debate me on the topic and if you agree with her. Defend it
Not once have you admitted that you were out of line for calling a female sitting member of Congress a "congresswhore". Until that issue of your sexism is settling, there is no debating with people like you.
The bile you consistently bring to this board belongs on stormfront, not ronfez.net.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-27-2011, 01:13 PM
Not once have you admitted that you were out of line for calling a female sitting member of Congress a "congresswhore". Until that issue of your sexism is settling, there is no debating with people like you.
The bile you consistently bring to this board belongs on stormfront, not ronfez.net.
Again vulgar names are called to all politicians but you have not ever expressed outraged. Youre outraged because she happens to be a female democrat from California admit that.
And whats with this worshipping of any politician. Are they better than you and I ? Shes a representative from CA in other words a highly paid public servant
Refer to the vile lines spewed about Palin and her family, all the shit Bill Maher says about Bachmann and I'll meet you half way.
When Walker was being compared to Hitler where was your outrage?
the thread should be locked up because you refuse to debate the topic.
Again vulgar names are called to all politicians but you have not ever expressed outraged. Youre outraged because she happens to be a female democrat from California admit that.
And whats with this worshipping of any politician. Are they better than you and I ? Shes a representative from CA in other words a highly paid public servant
Refer to the vile lines spewed about Palin and her family, all the shit Bill Maher says about Bachmann and I'll meet you half way.
When Walker was being compared to Hitler where was your outrage?
the thread should be locked up because you refuse to debate the topic.
Again, strawman the shit out of my words. I'll give you credit on your consistency.
And I'll state it again, the outrage is not selective, its a pattern of racism and sexism that you yourself have displayed on this message over a course of time.
Until you address your obvious problems, you can't be treated like an adult.
hanso
12-27-2011, 01:31 PM
Chillax you two I was gonna post a joke response.
Has the smoke cleared?
Don't attack me for bad timing/insensitivity but after the infighting maybe some levity is needed.
Just take them out back and hose them down as if they got back from the beach. But be careful not to get fatty pneumonia.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-27-2011, 01:50 PM
Chillax you two I was gonna post a joke response.
Has the smoke cleared?
Post away, need some humor in this thread
underdog
12-27-2011, 02:08 PM
if you are talking to me then I did mention " up to" i never said they would all cost that much but not 1 should cost that much. Is there really need for full locker rooms? Do men have full locker rooms or just shower stales with some school lockers? There isnt a firehouse in the country that would have that many women working at 1 time. If a firehouse has 100 firemen (which is a lot more then I think any 1 firehouse would have) maybe 5 would be women.
My town has about 70 firemen total with close to 100,000 resident and we have 3 firehouses. Thats a total of 23 per house. they could add a full addition to the firehouses for less then $100k.
Wasn't talking to you. Sorry if you thought I confused you with WF.
underdog
12-27-2011, 02:10 PM
I must have not posted that I want any upgrades provided by local funds. Shame on me.
A locker room might run in excess of 50K if it semi resembles the Yankees clubhouse. Should we provide flat screen TV's and plush couches and huge lockers for the ladies?
How about slots to put their purses in the lockers while we are at it, Hell lets allow more room for shoes
I dont believe that 2 sinks 2 stalls and a community shower is going to cost so much
Perfect.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-27-2011, 02:10 PM
I want to stick to the topic.
1. This congresswoman knows nothing about federalism and how fire depts operate and are funded
2. If cities/towns want to build a basic bathroom/locker room for women then they should fund it
3. Theres no way a bathroom and locker room would cost 100K unless add ons are put in like TV's and one of those fancy rain showers where water sprays from multiple directions
4. Why even go extravagant with this. There arent firehouses filled with mostly women working on a particular shift. A bathroom with a couple of stalls/sinks and a basic locker room wouldnt even cost 100k. I used NYC probably the largest fire dept in the country. Only 29 women are FDNY
underdog
12-27-2011, 02:12 PM
I want to stick to the topic.
1. This congresswoman knows nothing about federalism and how fire depts operate and are funded
2. If cities/towns want to build a basic bathroom/locker room for women then they should fund it
3. Theres no way a bathroom and locker room would cost 100K unless add ons are put in like TV's and one of those fancy rain showers where water sprays from multiple directions
4. Why even go extravagant with this. There arent firehouses filled with women working on a particular shift. A bathroom with a couple of stalls/sinks and a basic locker room wouldnt even cost 100k
Baseball and tvs!
I want to stick to the topic.
1. This congresswoman knows nothing about federalism and how fire depts operate and are funded
2. If cities/towns want to build a basic bathroom/locker room for women then they should fund it
3. Theres no way a bathroom and locker room would cost 100K unless add ons are put in like TV's and one of those fancy rain showers where water sprays from multiple directions
4. Why even go extravagant with this. There arent firehouses filled with mostly women working on a particular shift. A bathroom with a couple of stalls/sinks and a basic locker room wouldnt even cost 100k. I used NYC probably the largest fire dept in the country. Only 29 women are FDNY
You are like a petulant child who can't admit he's wrong.
Of course you want to "just discuss the issue" without conceding your infraction.
4. Why even go extravagant with this. There arent firehouses filled with mostly women working on a particular shift. A bathroom with a couple of stalls/sinks and a basic locker room wouldnt even cost 100k. I used NYC probably the largest fire dept in the country. Only 29 women are FDNY
Also, its hilarious that you of all people would bring a "separate but equal" argument into this failed thread.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-27-2011, 02:31 PM
You are like a petulant child who can't admit he's wrong.
Of course you want to "just discuss the issue" without conceding your infraction.
Im not going to discuss literally and figuratively with you again and I am not going to concede that shes a congressional whore. 99% of them in both parties both sexes and all races are whores to their special interests and corporate backers
1. The federal government should not be giving away our money for projects like this
2. Extravagant locker rooms and bathrooms arent needed for women. Why build something that resembles a 4 star hotel room for a place for women to shit and shower?
How am I wrong on the "issue"
Im not going to discuss literally and figuratively with you again and I am not going to concede that shes a congressional whore. 99% of them in both parties both sexes and all races are whores to their special interests and corporate backers
1. The federal government should not be giving away our money for projects like this
2. Extravagant locker rooms and bathrooms arent needed for women. Why build something that resembles a 4 star hotel room for a place for women to shit and shower?
How am I wrong on the "issue"
So you call a female Congresswoman a "congresswhore" and want to be treated like a serious person?
You might be the most ridiculous person I've encountered on this message board.
Furtherman
12-27-2011, 02:42 PM
http://www.greenbookblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Blindfolded_man_throwing_darts_BLD009417.jpg
disneyspy
12-27-2011, 02:43 PM
So you call a female Congresswoman a "congresswhore" and want to be treated like a serious person?
You might be the most ridiculous person I've encountered on this message board.
FACE!
WRESTLINGFAN
12-27-2011, 02:52 PM
So you call a female Congresswoman a "congresswhore" and want to be treated like a serious person?
You might be the most ridiculous person I've encountered on this message board.
Go and read what I posted. The congressmen are whores too. ? How am I not being clear to you ?
This has nothing to do with her vagina
I have asked you a number of times to debate the topic, why do you think this should be financed on the backs of people in other states?
Go and read what I posted. The congressmen are whores too. Do you know the difference btwn literally and figurative? How am I not being clear to you ?
I have asked you a number of times to debate the topic
You really are boring.
Try bringing a fun defense next time. Why don't you try something in a "I have brown friends so I can't be a racist" or a "I fuck women so I can't be a sexist" next time?
WRESTLINGFAN
12-27-2011, 03:00 PM
You really are boring.
Try bringing a fun defense next time. Why don't you try something in a "I have brown friends so I can't be a racist" or a "I fuck women so I can't be a sexist" next time?
Brown and Yellow to be exact.
My last 2 GF's have been Peruvian and Filipina
Good enough?
Brown and Yellow to be exact.
My last 2 GF's have been Peruvian and Filipina
Good enough?
You much like the late Strom Thurman have a colorblind penis.
Congrats.
hanso
12-27-2011, 04:36 PM
You really are boring.
Try bringing a fun defense next time. Why don't you try something in a "I have brown friends so I can't be a racist" or a "I fuck women so I can't be a sexist" next time?
You left out gays. Does he support the GLAAD organization?
You left out gays. Does he support the GLAAD organization?
Because he likes rainbows, he's obviously not homophobic.
keithy_19
12-27-2011, 05:03 PM
You might be the most ridiculous person I've encountered on this message board.
:bye:
weekapaugjz
12-27-2011, 05:10 PM
threads started by wrestlingfan continue to impress...
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 02:28 AM
You much like the late Strom Thurman have a colorblind penis.
Congrats.
When you can't even man up and debate a topic you bring up race and sex. You should work for Eric Holder, he'd love you.
Still don't know the difference btwn literally and figuratively.
I bet you think a signature from Josef Stalin is legit to recall Walker
When you can't even man up and debate a topic you bring up race and sex. You should work for Eric Holder, he'd love you.
Still don't know the difference btwn literally and figuratively.
I bet you think a signature from Josef Stalin is legit to recall Walker
Red Herring.
How can you be expected to be treated like an adult when you consistently act like a child on this board?
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 04:14 AM
Red Herring.
How can you be expected to be treated like an adult when you consistently act like a child on this board?
You were the one who brought up her race when her race had nothing to do with it. Her proposed legislation is idiotic and you can't seem to see that.
Now man up and tell me why you believe federal funds should be used to build these bathrooms?
Crispy123
12-28-2011, 07:35 AM
How can you be expected to be treated like an adult when you consistently act like a child on this board?
I continually let myself get sucked in to the stupidity and get angry with myself later. Then again, I have been divorced twice so apparently I don't learn my lesson.
tell me why you believe federal funds should be used to build these bathrooms?
Here I go again...
Gender equality is a federal issue.
Married Women's Property Act 1882
Mann Act
Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Equal Pay Act of 1963
Equal Rights Amendment (ERA)
Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act
Paycheck Fairness Act
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 07:38 AM
I have not said that women shouldnt get their own areas to shower and change.
Let the mayors find a way to pay for this.
Crispy123
12-28-2011, 07:41 AM
I have not said that women shouldnt get their own areas to shower and change.
Let the mayors find a way to pay for this.
Of course, as a former Marine, you wouldn't know anything about having a Federal mandate and at the same time not having Federal legislation to fund that mandate.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 07:44 AM
Of course, as a former Marine, you wouldn't know anything about having a Federal mandate and at the same time not having Federal legislation to fund that mandate.
The Military is a federal mandate see article 1 section 8.
As far as funding fire depts, schools and police please read the 10th amendment.
Article 4 section 4 mandates we have a little r republican form of gov't and not a democracy
Admit you want a national government
realmenhatelife
12-28-2011, 07:59 AM
Nothing ceases to amaze me on what some congresswhore wants to do with federal money.
Before anyone cries sexism here's my problem with it. Fire depts are locally funded thru property taxes. Why should people in other states subsidize this. Now if municipalities want to bring this up for a vote then theres no issue.
If this goes thru its a slippery slope. Whats next ? Bathrooms and showers for gays?
Also a bathroom can be made to suit a womans needs for less than 100k
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/201337-house-dem-proposes-federal-grants-to-build-womens-restrooms-in-fire-stations
Ha.
But you're right, if they're gonna spend 100k on one bathroom, I think that's just excessive.
Crispy123
12-28-2011, 08:01 AM
The Military is a federal mandate see article 1 section 8.
As far as funding fire depts, schools and police please read the 10th amendment.
Article 4 section 4 mandates we have a little r republican form of gov't and not a democracy
Admit you want a national government
Epo please smack me in the head.
Crispy123
12-28-2011, 08:10 AM
The Military is a federal mandate see article 1 section 8..
Gender equality is a federal issue.
Married Women's Property Act 1882
Mann Act
Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Equal Pay Act of 1963
Equal Rights Amendment (ERA)
Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act
Paycheck Fairness Act
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972
Article 4 section 4 mandates we have a little r republican form of gov't and not a democracy
Admit you want a national government
FYI, we have a constitutional republic here in the good 'ol US of A.
And yes I will FREELY admit I want a national government. In fact, I swore an oath several times to defend that government and spent 10+ years of my life fighting for the national government.
hanso
12-28-2011, 08:25 AM
FYI, we have a constitutional republic here in the good 'ol US of A.
And yes I will FREELY admit I want a national government. In fact, I swore an oath several times to defend that government and spent 10+ years of my life fighting for the national government.
As did I in the reserve. Maybe he fought for Ron Paul's National Sovereignty.
Crispy123
12-28-2011, 08:28 AM
As did I in the reserve. Maybe he fought for Ron Paul's National Sovereignty.
Reserves?!?! Might as well have joined the boy scouts.
Just kidding!!! What branch?
hanso
12-28-2011, 08:29 AM
Reserves?!?! Might as well have joined the boy scouts.
Just kidding!!! What branch?
USNR Same as one Tom Selleck with the ten year term.
Crispy123
12-28-2011, 08:34 AM
USNR Same as one Tom Selleck with the ten year term.
Nice, thanks for your service! My brothers Navy stationed at Pearl Harbor.
Did you also have the 'stache and wear the short shorts?
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 08:36 AM
FYI, we have a constitutional republic here in the good 'ol US of A.
And yes I will FREELY admit I want a national government. In fact, I swore an oath several times to defend that government and spent 10+ years of my life fighting for the national government.
Agreed to the constitutional republic. But article 4 section 4 reads a republican form of government meaning not a democracy
My enlistment contract stated that I would support and defend the constitution.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 08:38 AM
Reserves?!?! Might as well have joined the boy scouts.
Just kidding!!! What branch?
After Parris Island The air wing was basically the boy scouts
Crispy123
12-28-2011, 08:42 AM
Agreed to the constitutional republic. But article 4 section 4 reads a republican form of government meaning not a democracy
And what does that have to do with the discussion? Nothing, just standard WF debate tactics.
My enlistment contract stated that I would support and defend the constitution.
Yes, the constitution of the United States of America. The national government of the 50 states of America.
If you were a guardsman, you would have also sworn to support and defend the constitution of whatever state you joined.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 08:48 AM
Yes, the Constitution of the United States of America. The national government of the 50 states of America.
If you were a guardsman, you would have also sworn to support and defend the constitution of whatever state you joined.
Its a federal government, a national government is something like a western European social democracy
True about guardsmen, but they can also be federalized Speaking of which why the fuck were guard units deployed to Iraq
Crispy123
12-28-2011, 08:52 AM
I just LOVE arguing semantics. Its what my 7 year old daughter does when she wants to be right too!
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 08:59 AM
Its not semantics
We have 50 states, We dont have a parliament. We are not a democracy, now we have a democratic small d process of legislating If NYC wants to build gender firendly bathrooms then Mike Bloomberg needs to find a way to come up with funding
I know this irritates you but the 50 states comprise the United States meaning each state operates different than each other. Now NY just approved gay marriage but Florida didnt. Theres nothing in the constitution that says the federal government has control over marriage or local issues like fire depts refer to the 10th amendment
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Crispy123
12-28-2011, 09:02 AM
Its not semantics
We have 50 states, We dont have a parliament. We are not a democracy, now we have a democratic small d process of legislating If NYC wants to build gender firendly bathrooms then Mike Bloomberg needs to find a way to come up with funding
I know this irritates you but the 50 states comprise the United States meaning each state operates different than each other. Now NY just approved gay marriage but Florida didnt. Theres nothing in the constitution that says the federal government has control over marriage or local issues like fire depts refer to the 10th amendment
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
You can't be this fucking retarded, can you?
Fuck it I'm out. At least my daughter has basic reading and comprehension skills.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 09:05 AM
You can't be this fucking retarded, can you?
Seriously, do you know how our government is setup?
You have a very skewed view of how government works
We have different layers, locak, state and federal.
There are 18 enumarated powers of the fed gov't. Example raising and supporting a navy.
Anything outside article 1 sec 8 is left to the states.
Counterpoint:
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 09:38 AM
Counterpoint:
Alas, Subject to the jurisdiction, and at the time of the ratification it was meant for children of slaves. It has nothing to do with anchor babies
hanso
12-28-2011, 09:44 AM
Nice, thanks for your service! My brothers Navy stationed at Pearl Harbor.
Did you also have the 'stache and wear the short shorts?
Always had a 'stache and the short shorts were the attire for doing PT in boot camp at SD.
hanso
12-28-2011, 09:52 AM
Its a federal government, a national government is something like a western European social democracy
True about guardsmen, but they can also be federalized Speaking of which why the fuck were guard units deployed to Iraq
The Federales Yee-ha! Arriba!
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 09:53 AM
Always had a 'stache and the short shorts were the attire for doing PT in boot camp at SD.
They were these correct?
UDT Shorts
http://armynavymart.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/u/d/udtshorts.jpg
The Marines in force Recon always wore them for PT
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 09:57 AM
The Federales Yee-ha! Arriba!
Mexico is a different monster to deal with as the Federales have infiltrated the Cartels. Afghanistan is safer
hanso
12-28-2011, 09:59 AM
They were these correct?
UDT Shorts
http://armynavymart.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/u/d/udtshorts.jpg
The Marines in force Recon always wore them for PT
From what I remember they were yellow pull up's
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 10:27 AM
I have no problem with them making every firehouse have 2 bathrooms. I dont understand why a toilet sink and shower would, could or should cost up to $100,000? Thats a problem and that is why so many people hate politics and govt spending. Something that could cost a few grand cost 10 x that or more because the govt is paying for it?
Fire jobs should go to all those who are qualified. Color nor sex should matter and the fire house should work well for all working there. That being said there should be standard testing across the board. No grading curves for skin color and no fitness curves for sex.
the Wise latina Sotomayor disagrees
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124354041637563491.html
Snacks
12-28-2011, 10:37 AM
the Wise latina Sotomayor disagrees
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124354041637563491.html
thats from almost 3 years ago so I dont know what has happened since. But at the time I thought that was wrong. Color has nothing to do with promotions when its test based about a job that everyone currently works on. If some pass then those should get the promotion. There cant be a quota on promotions for sex or color especially when it is performance based or in this case where you are all tested on the jobs you currently hold. If you dont score high enough thats on you and you not knowing your own job as well as someone else. The color of ones skin had nothing to do with why you didnt do well it was your lack of knowledge of your job and what it takes to be the next level.
I would rather see someone get promotions based on testing their current job and what required on their possible new job rather then being promoted by someones opinion. When a promotion is given by a manager or owner then ability and performance will or can be overlooked and those in charge may promote based on ones prejudice or friendships/ family members etc. Thats wrong!
Alas, Subject to the jurisdiction, and at the time of the ratification it was meant for children of slaves. It has nothing to do with anchor babies
Female firefighters looking to have equal opportunity at their jobs are anchor babies?
hanso
12-28-2011, 10:40 AM
Would be better if they cut funding and had more discrimination. :innocent:
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 10:48 AM
Female firefighters looking to have equal opportunity at their jobs are anchor babies?
If they were born to legal residents or citizens then they are protected under the 14th amendment.
The term equal opportunity is vague. Should blind people become pilots? The US military discriminates. If someone is over the age limit, they can't enlist
Hell if you want to become president you have to be at least 35 sorry milleneals you gotta wait a few years
hanso
12-28-2011, 10:52 AM
This is better then the Hash thread. Think I got a contact high.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 10:52 AM
If a woman wants to become a firefighter and she is able to pass the written and physical tests and can complete the academy with no special exemptions or favors then theres no problem.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 10:54 AM
How many women could there be assigned to 1 fire house? I used NYC as an example. 11,500 firemen and only 29 of them are women. 5 Boros maybe the most in 1 firehouse is 3
Theres no way a separate bathroom/locker room could cost even close to 100k
Crispy123
12-28-2011, 11:24 AM
pointless, I know, as WF will misread and assign whatever nonsensical, xenophobic meaning is floating around in that vapid skull, but here it goes:
(d) AMOUNT.—Grants provided under this Act shall be in an amount determined by the Secretary based on the size and demonstrated need of the fire station and not to exceed $100,000.
any one who has worked for the FEDERAL government, AKA the NATIONAL government of the US of A, knows the term "NOT TO EXCEED" means something VERY different than, "you will spend this amount every time you use these funds."
SonOfSmeagol
12-28-2011, 11:32 AM
[SIZE="3\ "you will spend this amount every time you use these funds."[/SIZE]
no one said that. the point is that the Fed gov't has no business spending any taxpayer time or resources on firehouse bathrooms. the states and locales can handle it fine. isn't there enough else for the Feds to do
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 11:34 AM
Dollar amount is meaningless in regards to this becauae again FIREHOUSES ARE FUNDED LOCALLY!!!!
What is Xenophobic about having the local gov't pay for local agencies?
.
Now if they want to build gender friendly bathrooms in the Pentagon then thats a federal department
Crispy123
12-28-2011, 12:18 PM
no one said that.
yes they did.
Theres no way a separate bathroom/locker room could cost even close to 100k
the point is that the Fed gov't has no business spending any taxpayer time or resources on firehouse bathrooms. the states and locales can handle it fine. isn't there enough else for the Feds to do
OK. for the THIRD time today in this thread, GENDER EQUALITY IS A FEDERAL ISSUE.
You were the one who brought up her race when her race had nothing to do with it. Her proposed legislation is idiotic and you can't seem to see that.
Now man up and tell me why you believe federal funds should be used to build these bathrooms?
You are the one who called a Congresswoman a "congresswhore" and wants to be treated like an adult.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 12:35 PM
yes they did.
OK. for the THIRD time today in this thread, GENDER EQUALITY IS A FEDERAL ISSUE.
Funding this is a local issue for the umpteenth time
OK. for the THIRD time today in this thread, GENDER EQUALITY IS A FEDERAL ISSUE.
His reading comprehension is low when a message board fails to deliver the type of "exciting" information contained on stormfront!
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 12:36 PM
You are the one who called a Congresswoman a "congresswhore" and wants to be treated like an adult.
Walker the douchebag is ok in your book then. I see now.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 12:39 PM
His reading comprehension is low when a message board fails to deliver the type of "exciting" information contained on stormfront!
Is that the lines the Democratic party of Wisconsin puts in your book of replies?
Do you know the meaning of federalism? Should someone in NY pay an AFSCME members salary in Wisnonsin?
Walker the douchebag is ok in your book then. I see now.
False equivalency you douchebag.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 12:45 PM
False equivalency you douchebag.
You sound like a stormfront member.
Also refer to article 1 section 8 of the constitution and also Tenth amendment.
While youre at it. I'll say it again. Look up figurative vs Literal.
You sound like a stormfront member.
I'm rubber and you're glue, whatever you throw bounces off of me and sticks to you.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 12:53 PM
yes they did.
OK. for the THIRD time today in this thread, GENDER EQUALITY IS A FEDERAL ISSUE.
Lets have the federal government pay to upgrade the bathrooms and locker rooms at a Fedex facility. After all Women work for Fedex. Hell lets do it for UPS and other private companies. Gender equality afterall
Lets have the federal government pay to upgrade the bathrooms and locker rooms at a Fedex facility. After all Women work for Fedex. Hell lets do it for UPS and other private companies. Gender equality afterall
Red herring.
Maybe you should use one of these?
http://www.rufwork.com/101/assignments/toulmin/toulminDiagram.png
underdog
12-28-2011, 01:19 PM
Lets have the federal government pay to upgrade the bathrooms and locker rooms at a Fedex facility. After all Women work for Fedex. Hell lets do it for UPS and other private companies. Gender equality afterall
When you make posts like this, do you think you're doing a good job? Or are you laughing at your keyboard because even you cannot believe how little sense you make?
SonOfSmeagol
12-28-2011, 01:32 PM
http://www.rufwork.com/101/assignments/toulmin/toulminDiagram.png
who's the douchebag now
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 02:10 PM
When you make posts like this, do you think you're doing a good job? Or are you laughing at your keyboard because even you cannot believe how little sense you make?
Its making a counterpoint. I'll explain.
Since gender equality is federal, should the federal government pay for upgrades in any workplace?
What part of article 1 section 8 isnt clear?
hanso
12-28-2011, 02:18 PM
Its making a counterpoint. I'll explain.
Since gender equality is federal, should the federal government pay for upgrades in any workplace?
What part of article 1 section 8 isnt clear?
Do you think for a moment that any state now run by the right will accept these funds?
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 02:19 PM
Just in case anyone wants to take a look
1 - The Congress shall have power To lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defence and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
2 - To borrow money on the credit of the United States;
3 - To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;
4 - To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States;
5 - To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures;
6 - To provide for the punishment of counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States;
7 - To establish post offices and post roads;
8 - To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries;
9 - To constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court;
10 - To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations;
11 - To declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water;
12 - To raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years;
13 - To provide and maintain a navy;
14 - To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces;
15 - To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;
16 - To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
17 - To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings;—And
18 - To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 02:21 PM
Do you think for a moment that any state now run by the right will accept these funds?
Perry is the biggest hypocrite of them all. Blasts the stimulus but gladly takes it to plug a deficit.
hanso
12-28-2011, 02:24 PM
Perry is the biggest hypocrite of them all. Blasts the stimulus but gladly takes it to plug a deficit.
That's just it, sometimes they will take the money and try to do what they please with it.
But for the most part they turn it down initially as a facade. They will cut education/public sector to the bone. Only to help the same later in their term as it nears election time.
And this is a public sector issue I bet next to none of the states that are run by the right (32 think it is) would take this funding. As the same amount have any interest in it running properly.
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 02:28 PM
For arguments sake. lets say it was a mostly Demcratic house and it got passed in the senate too
Then whats the next group? Will Muslims and Jews want separate kitchens to prepare Halal and Kosher meals. Why not ask for a federal grant. After all the women got their new bathrooms
WRESTLINGFAN
12-28-2011, 02:31 PM
That's just it, sometimes they will take the money and try to do what they please with it.
But for the most part they turn it down initially as a facade.
Thats why when you hear people like Romney and Perry rail against big gov't it is a facade
Another example is Bachmann. Hates big gov't but will gladly take her farm subsidies. The 2 parties might be different but in a way they are the same. Both want big gov't to suit their needs
But also sometimes money is forced out too. For example some of the healthier banks did not need TARP funds but were forced to take it. I think Wells Fargo and State Street were some of them
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.