TripleSkeet
01-06-2011, 08:54 PM
Anyone else think this is ridiculous, dangerous and overall just wrong?
http://www.cnn.com/2011/SHOWBIZ/01/04/new.huck.finn.ew/index.html
(EW.com) -- What is a word worth? According to Publishers Weekly, NewSouth Books' upcoming edition of Mark Twain's seminal novel "Adventures of Huckleberry Finn" will remove all instances of the N-word -- I'll give you a hint, it's not nonesuch -- present in the text and replace it with slave.
The new book will also remove usage of the word Injun. The effort is spearheaded by Twain expert Alan Gribben, who says his PC-ified version is not an attempt to neuter the classic but rather to update it.
"Race matters in these books," Gribben told PW. "It's a matter of how you express that in the 21st century."
Is editing "Huckleberry Finn" a good idea? Tell us what you think
Unsurprisingly, there are already those who are yelling "Censorship!" as well as others with thesauruses yelling "Bowdlerization!" and "Comstockery!"
Their position is understandable: Twain's book has been one of the most often misunderstood novels of all time, continuously being accused of perpetuating the prejudiced attitudes it is criticizing, and it's a little disheartening to see a cave-in to those who would ban a book simply because it requires context.
On the other hand, if this puts the book into the hands of kids who would not otherwise be allowed to read it due to forces beyond their control (overprotective parents and the school boards they frighten), then maybe we shouldn't be so quick to judge.
Teachers: Which version of "Huck Finn" would you teach?
It's unfortunate, but is it really any more catastrophic than a TBS-friendly re-edit of "The Godfather," you down-and-dirty melon farmer?
The original product is changed for the benefit of those who, for one reason or another, are not mature enough to handle it, but as long as it doesn't affect the original, is there a problem?
What do you think -- unnecessary censorship or necessary evil? Let us know in the comments below.
I get that the original will still be available, but wasnt one of the purposes of Huck Finn to critique racism? Is erasing the term as if it was never used a smart thing to do? And is it right to change a classic piece of art in order to appease those who are so easily offended?
I dont know, to me this feels like putting a tank top over the Venus de Milo.
http://www.cnn.com/2011/SHOWBIZ/01/04/new.huck.finn.ew/index.html
(EW.com) -- What is a word worth? According to Publishers Weekly, NewSouth Books' upcoming edition of Mark Twain's seminal novel "Adventures of Huckleberry Finn" will remove all instances of the N-word -- I'll give you a hint, it's not nonesuch -- present in the text and replace it with slave.
The new book will also remove usage of the word Injun. The effort is spearheaded by Twain expert Alan Gribben, who says his PC-ified version is not an attempt to neuter the classic but rather to update it.
"Race matters in these books," Gribben told PW. "It's a matter of how you express that in the 21st century."
Is editing "Huckleberry Finn" a good idea? Tell us what you think
Unsurprisingly, there are already those who are yelling "Censorship!" as well as others with thesauruses yelling "Bowdlerization!" and "Comstockery!"
Their position is understandable: Twain's book has been one of the most often misunderstood novels of all time, continuously being accused of perpetuating the prejudiced attitudes it is criticizing, and it's a little disheartening to see a cave-in to those who would ban a book simply because it requires context.
On the other hand, if this puts the book into the hands of kids who would not otherwise be allowed to read it due to forces beyond their control (overprotective parents and the school boards they frighten), then maybe we shouldn't be so quick to judge.
Teachers: Which version of "Huck Finn" would you teach?
It's unfortunate, but is it really any more catastrophic than a TBS-friendly re-edit of "The Godfather," you down-and-dirty melon farmer?
The original product is changed for the benefit of those who, for one reason or another, are not mature enough to handle it, but as long as it doesn't affect the original, is there a problem?
What do you think -- unnecessary censorship or necessary evil? Let us know in the comments below.
I get that the original will still be available, but wasnt one of the purposes of Huck Finn to critique racism? Is erasing the term as if it was never used a smart thing to do? And is it right to change a classic piece of art in order to appease those who are so easily offended?
I dont know, to me this feels like putting a tank top over the Venus de Milo.