View Full Version : Nukes or Zombies
furie
11-04-2008, 03:03 PM
Which do you think you would have a better chance of surviving; a nuclear holocaust or a zombie holocaust?
The problem with the nukes is that it's hard to find a radiation proof shelter but you will usually have a little warning. Where as with zombies, the shelter doesn't have to be all too sophisticated, but one day you will wake up in the dawn of the dead, no prep time.
Flea_Man
11-04-2008, 03:08 PM
Nukes are impossible. Zombies is do-able. Aim for the head.
jauble
11-04-2008, 03:09 PM
I read the survival guide so Im good...also I would trip flea man if needed if we were being chased and it "had" to happen.
Flea_Man
11-04-2008, 03:13 PM
I've fought zombies face to face before. I've stopped nuclear warfare but wouldn't know what to do when nukes hit, even though I have survived post-apocolispe scenerios (no spellcheck on this edition of Firefox I'm on).
suggums
11-04-2008, 06:56 PM
nukes are the perfect excuse to break out my power armor
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1408/541544780_e68b8aab3d.jpg
GameRelatedSig
11-04-2008, 08:28 PM
Zombies. All the way.
CofyCrakCocaine
11-04-2008, 08:38 PM
I dream about how to fend off zombie apocalypses on an annual basis. Definitely geared for zombs
jennysmurf
11-04-2008, 08:56 PM
I'm not a fighter, so I'd rather just die immediately from the bombs. Of course, knowing my luck, I wouldn't die immediately. I'd get horrible radiation poisoning and die very slowly. :down:
stinkbud
11-04-2008, 08:58 PM
if its certain death....and if I KNOW that the zombies WILL kill me as sure as a nuke will, then give me the nuke. I gotta think that being eaten alive by ghouls and then having to join them in the quest for live flesh is a hell of a lot more horrifying and painful than instant vaporization.
commish13
11-05-2008, 02:33 AM
Zombies would be a way more fun time. I'd just be making jokes and killing zombies until I got taken out. It would be awesome.
indymike
11-05-2008, 04:31 AM
Gimme a case of Iron City beer and lets go Zombie huntin!
topless_mike
11-05-2008, 05:53 AM
where does the axe-weilding midget come into play ?
MisterSmith
11-05-2008, 06:10 AM
where does the axe-weilding midget come into play ?
In the nuke scenario. Who do you think started the war?
And I would go with Zombies. It is kind of a depressing existence, but you don't have to worry about radiation poisoning, nuclear winter, and the other stuff that comes from nuclear devestation. It is possible to fend off zombies and maintain a semblance of normal life, although it would definitely be hard and require constant vigilance.
Thebazile78
11-05-2008, 06:27 AM
Too many of you have read Max Brooks to make this anything other than a landslide in favor of being attacked by zombies. (Aim for the head, act quietly and remember that, although fire is an effective sterilization weapon, a fireball pack of burning ghouls is even more dangerous than the ghouls themselves.)
This could be a good thing or a bad thing, but I honestly wouldn't want to be holed up with any of you fuckos and have to rely upon you to fight off ghouls with me.
topless_mike
11-05-2008, 06:29 AM
This could be a good thing or a bad thing, but I honestly wouldn't want to be holed up with any of you fuckos and have to rely upon you to fight off ghouls with me.
i'll protect you, but its going to cost you that fansky new tv you got.
Thebazile78
11-05-2008, 06:33 AM
i'll protect you, but its going to cost you that fansky new tv you got.
Oooh, I gotta ask Matty about that. Technically, it's "his" TV despite the fact that my arse and the couch have had some serious bonding time with it since it arrived.
Freitag
11-05-2008, 07:40 AM
Oooh, I gotta ask Matty about that. Technically, it's "his" TV despite the fact that my arse and the couch have had some serious bonding time with it since it arrived.
1) Nukes. As my wife can attest to, my germphobia and OCD leads to massive zombie hatred. With a passion. At least with Nukes, I can be Mad Max.
2) The TV will be worthless after a nuclear attack. No one will be broadcasting.
furie
11-05-2008, 04:32 PM
if its certain death....and if I KNOW that the zombies WILL kill me as sure as a nuke will, then give me the nuke. I gotta think that being eaten alive by ghouls and then having to join them in the quest for live flesh is a hell of a lot more horrifying and painful than instant vaporization.
nothing certain. you have a chance to survive either. it all comes down to which you think you'd be better equipped to survive, or at least survive long in.
furie
11-05-2008, 04:33 PM
In the nuke scenario. Who do you think started the war?
Oddly enough, the Zombies
Schitzilla
11-09-2008, 10:59 AM
Nukes are too quick. Also, I'm a lover not a fighter. I hope the zombies are incredibly horny...
biozombie
11-09-2008, 11:06 AM
Definitely The Zombies, as long as Rod Argent doesn't try to slip any of that 1970's bullshit past us.
ChimneyFish
11-09-2008, 11:16 AM
2) The TV will be worthless after a nuclear attack. No one will be broadcasting.
Except for MTV.
Tenbatsuzen
11-09-2008, 11:30 AM
Except for MTV.
Never saw Spies Like Us, did you?
Foster
11-09-2008, 11:43 AM
i always thought nukes and zombies went hand in hand
drop the nuke, radiation creates zombies
thats what i was taught in school
ChimneyFish
11-09-2008, 11:46 AM
Never saw Spies Like Us, did you?
Of course I did.
Forgot about that.
I had to go check out the youtube clip, because it was so long ago that I watched it.
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.