TomPoo
11-14-2001, 09:29 AM
this is his recent article reacting to his question of Celebrity accountability in fundraising. I am not a big fan of his, but alot of what he says here is true. It is a VERY good article and what he says about only small percentages of the money collected for Sept 11th just makes me ill. To think that these "humanitarian" organizations are doing this is just aweful... and makes me angry that right now men are off defending our nation, and this is currently going on right now in it.
Hollywood strikes back
by Bill O'Reilly
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
c 2001 WorldNetDaily.com
George Clooney is after me. Tom Hanks thinks I'm a jerk. And Faith Hill is disgusted with your humble correspondent. That last one hurts.
All of this fear and loathing is the result of my asking one simple question: If a celebrity asks for money for a charitable cause, does that celebrity have any responsibility to see that the money donated finds its way to the cause?
At issue are the concerts and TV telethon that raised hundreds of millions of dollars for the grieving families of the terror victims. As of four weeks after the attack, the United Way, which is distributing the donations, had more than $200 million in the bank according to its own records, but had dispersed only 15 percent of the money it had collected to agencies in a position to help the families.
And the Red Cross has told Congress that as much as 80 percent of the money it has received through 9-11 fundraisers will not go to the families. Instead, it will be used by the Red Cross for other projects.
Right now 160 charities have received money that was donated to help the families. Yet very few of those charities have contacted the grieving people. They are not proactive. They want the people who are burying dead husbands and wives, to seek them out. They want the families to ask for money - money that was donated by generous Americans so that these families would not have to deal with this kind of angst.
The House Ways and Means Committee is holding hearings on the matter. The attorney general of New York is supposedly setting up a website to help the families, yet that is taking a very, very long time. And Elliot Spitzer is not exactly taking to the airwaves publicizing it.
The United Way is thinking about running television public-service announcements to tell the families where they can get information and help. They've been thinking about that for more than a month. It hasn't happened yet.
In light of all these facts, I asked the telethon celebrities to issue a statement on the chaotic charity situation. None of them would.
So I went on television and named some of those famous people who would not respond. Wooo. All of a sudden statements came flying faster than a Letterman wise crack. George Clooney called me a liar. Tom Hanks said my reporting was a TV "sweeps" stunt. Faith Hill said she was appalled that I would dare to question the telethon.
Only four out of more than 100 celebrities stepped up and voiced any concern that the donated money was not being handled properly: Clint Eastwood, the singer James Brown, Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell. They didn't all agree with me about celebrity accountability, but at least they cared enough to discuss the issue.
People are asking me if I am surprised by the vicious tone of some of the Hollywood attacks on me. No, I'm not. Many of these people are outraged that someone in the press would attempt to hold them accountable for anything. After all, they are stars. They lead lives of privilege and are rarely confronted with the realities of life as long as they are making big money.
[b]Most stars have publicists who pretty much tell them what to say and how to act in public. These publicists threaten anyone who would criticize a star with banishment. That is, if you say something negative, the star will never talk to you again, and neither will anyone he knows. Thus the entertainment press is
Hollywood strikes back
by Bill O'Reilly
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
c 2001 WorldNetDaily.com
George Clooney is after me. Tom Hanks thinks I'm a jerk. And Faith Hill is disgusted with your humble correspondent. That last one hurts.
All of this fear and loathing is the result of my asking one simple question: If a celebrity asks for money for a charitable cause, does that celebrity have any responsibility to see that the money donated finds its way to the cause?
At issue are the concerts and TV telethon that raised hundreds of millions of dollars for the grieving families of the terror victims. As of four weeks after the attack, the United Way, which is distributing the donations, had more than $200 million in the bank according to its own records, but had dispersed only 15 percent of the money it had collected to agencies in a position to help the families.
And the Red Cross has told Congress that as much as 80 percent of the money it has received through 9-11 fundraisers will not go to the families. Instead, it will be used by the Red Cross for other projects.
Right now 160 charities have received money that was donated to help the families. Yet very few of those charities have contacted the grieving people. They are not proactive. They want the people who are burying dead husbands and wives, to seek them out. They want the families to ask for money - money that was donated by generous Americans so that these families would not have to deal with this kind of angst.
The House Ways and Means Committee is holding hearings on the matter. The attorney general of New York is supposedly setting up a website to help the families, yet that is taking a very, very long time. And Elliot Spitzer is not exactly taking to the airwaves publicizing it.
The United Way is thinking about running television public-service announcements to tell the families where they can get information and help. They've been thinking about that for more than a month. It hasn't happened yet.
In light of all these facts, I asked the telethon celebrities to issue a statement on the chaotic charity situation. None of them would.
So I went on television and named some of those famous people who would not respond. Wooo. All of a sudden statements came flying faster than a Letterman wise crack. George Clooney called me a liar. Tom Hanks said my reporting was a TV "sweeps" stunt. Faith Hill said she was appalled that I would dare to question the telethon.
Only four out of more than 100 celebrities stepped up and voiced any concern that the donated money was not being handled properly: Clint Eastwood, the singer James Brown, Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell. They didn't all agree with me about celebrity accountability, but at least they cared enough to discuss the issue.
People are asking me if I am surprised by the vicious tone of some of the Hollywood attacks on me. No, I'm not. Many of these people are outraged that someone in the press would attempt to hold them accountable for anything. After all, they are stars. They lead lives of privilege and are rarely confronted with the realities of life as long as they are making big money.
[b]Most stars have publicists who pretty much tell them what to say and how to act in public. These publicists threaten anyone who would criticize a star with banishment. That is, if you say something negative, the star will never talk to you again, and neither will anyone he knows. Thus the entertainment press is