Box Scores Divisional games 1966-1974 [Archive]

View Full Version : Box Scores Divisional games 1966-1974

CYYYFYYY

01-06-2007, 10:37 AM

<div>I do not believe they exist. I mean the whole damn boxscores. Not just the scores. THE STATS> Do not say pro football reference. ANYONE PLEASE!  NFL AND AFL!  HELP!!!!!!!!</div>

FezPaul

01-06-2007, 10:44 AM

cougarjake13

01-06-2007, 01:09 PM

yeh i would say pro football reference or databasefootball.com but they dont really help eitheri know when i was in high school my library had a football encyclopedia that listed every box score, team, player, everythingdont remember the name though

CYYYFYYY

01-06-2007, 01:55 PM

<div>I have 3 encyclopedias, the NFL are hiding these stats. WHY!?!??!?!?</div>

cougarjake13

01-06-2007, 01:56 PM

CYYYFYYY wrote: *>I have 3 encyclopedias, the NFL are hiding these stats. WHY!?!??!?!? vietnam ???

FezPaul

01-06-2007, 09:41 PM

cougarjake13 wrote: CYYYFYYY wrote: *>I have 3 encyclopedias, the NFL are hiding these stats. WHY!?!??!?!? vietnam ???It's a conspiracy maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan!

cougarjake13

01-07-2007, 08:15 AM

FezPaul wrote: cougarjake13 wrote: CYYYFYYY wrote: *>I have 3 encyclopedias, the NFL are hiding these stats. WHY!?!??!?!? vietnam ???It's a conspiracy maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan!its the only plausible explanation

Judge Smails

01-08-2007, 11:02 AM

CYYYFYYY wrote:  *>I do not believe they exist. I mean the whole damn boxscores. Not just the scores. THE STATS> Do not say pro football reference. ANYONE PLEASE!  NFL AND AFL!  HELP!!!!!!!! <a href="http://nflhistory.net/linescores/index.asp">This is probably as close as you're going to get</a>

phixion

01-08-2007, 11:18 AM

try going to individual clubs website and look at their history. each clubs pretty much has the media guide online the media guide has everything and i mean everything

CYYYFYYY

01-08-2007, 05:50 PM

What are these clubs you speak of? If you mean team sights guess again.

Bossanova

01-08-2007, 05:53 PM

I bet they don'y want people adding up stats then making cases for new record holders.  I forget when they started keeping track of stats.

cougarjake13

01-08-2007, 06:03 PM

Bossanova wrote: I bet they don'y want people adding up stats then making cases for new record holders.  I forget when they started keeping track of stats.it wasnt until the 80's i thinkb/c i remember the argument against lawrence taylor having the record was cheap b/c of the guys before him prob had a ton more but nobody kept track

Judge Smails

01-08-2007, 06:13 PM

cougarjake13 wrote: Bossanova wrote: I bet they don'y want people adding up stats then making cases for new record holders.  I forget when they started keeping track of stats.it wasnt until the 80's i thinkb/c i remember the argument against lawrence taylor having the record was cheap b/c of the guys before him prob had a ton more but nobody kept trackWhen Strahan broke LT's record they said that LT had more sacks than that number but they did not keep those stats in his rookie year.  I'm too lazy to look it up but if you check when LT was a rookie - they started keeping track the next year.

cougarjake13

01-08-2007, 06:26 PM

Judge Smails wrote: cougarjake13 wrote: Bossanova wrote: I bet they don'y want people adding up stats then making cases for new record holders.  I forget when they started keeping track of stats.it wasnt until the 80's i thinkb/c i remember the argument against lawrence taylor having the record was cheap b/c of the guys before him prob had a ton more but nobody kept trackWhen Strahan broke LT's record they said that LT had more sacks than that number but they did not keep those stats in his rookie year.  I'm too lazy to look it up but if you check when LT was a rookie - they started keeping track the next year. yeh but not much more<table border="0" class="infobox" style="width: 23em; text-align: left"><tbody><tr><th><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_record" title="World record">Records</a></th><td>Tied for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Giants" title="New York Giants">New York Giants</a> Career Sacks record (132.5) with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Strahan" title="Michael Strahan">Michael Strahan</a> (Taylor would have 141.5 sacks if it weren't for the fact that the sack was not a stat in his rookie season)</td></tr></tbody></table>

Bossanova

01-08-2007, 06:30 PM

No idea how many he had in his career, but Deacon Jones should still be the all time leader.  He had 26 unofficial sacks in 14 games early in his career

cougarjake13

01-08-2007, 06:51 PM

Bossanova wrote: No idea how many he had in his career, but Deacon Jones should still be the all time leader.  He had 26 unofficial sacks in 14 games early in his career thats what I always hear that deke would have some serious numbers

CYYYFYYY

01-09-2007, 03:50 AM

Yes they did not keep track of the sack record till the 80's however these are normal stats. I do have all the super bowl stats and the championship stats and believe me that took some hard work. However the divisional game stats are impossible to get. Should it really be this hard????

CYYYFYYY

01-09-2007, 03:50 AM

cougarjake13

01-09-2007, 04:37 PM

CYYYFYYY wrote: Yes they did not keep track of the sack record till the 80's however these are normal stats. I do have all the super bowl stats and the championship stats and believe me that took some hard work. However the divisional game stats are impossible to get. Should it really be this hard???? it shouldnt be that hard but unless you went to the library and checked out all the old newspapers and added up the stats it gonna look like your shit out of look

CYYYFYYY

01-13-2007, 12:36 PM

To the Library I go!

DJEvelEd

01-13-2007, 12:53 PM

Stats are what they are, STATISTICS! The NFL should go back and update everyone's stats. If Taylor had those numbers, how the hell can the NFL deny it? What the hell do these statisticians do all day?!?They probably have their office on the 14th floor of a 13 story building too!They have done retro-stats with QB's because I saw the passer rating for Johnny Unitas once on TV.