View Full Version : NEWSFLASH- Vampires Don't Exist!
Patches
10-27-2006, 10:15 AM
<p>And they never could have. Sorry to ruin Halloween.</p><p><a href="http://www.livescience.com/othernews/061025_vampire_debunk.html">http://www.livescience.com/othernews/061025_vampire_debunk.html</a></p><p><em>On Jan 1, 1600, the </em><a href="http://www.livescience.com/othernews/060224_world_population.html"><em>human population</em></a><em> was 536,870,911. If the first vampire came into existence that day and bit one person a month, there would have been two vampires by Feb. 1, 1600. A month later there would have been four, and so on. In just two-and-a-half years the original human population would all have become vampires with nobody left to feed on. </em></p><p class="style1"><em>If mortality rates were taken into consideration, the population would disappear much faster. Even an unrealistically high </em><a href="http://www.livescience.com/reproduction/"><em>reproduction</em></a><em> rate couldn't counteract this effect.</em> </p><p class="style1">Now get rid of that garlic, ya stinky bastards.</p>
Tall_James
10-27-2006, 10:24 AM
NEWSFLASH - Water is wet !!!!
<p><img src="http://www.countgore.com/images/GDVnew.jpg" border="0" /></p><p><strong><a href="http://www.countgore.com/" target="_blank">I beg to differ! BLAH!</a></strong></p>
Justice4all
10-27-2006, 10:47 AM
Yes, they do exist.
Doctor Manhattan
10-27-2006, 10:48 AM
<strong>Patches</strong> wrote:<br /><p><em>...If the first vampire came into existence that day and bit one person a month, there would have been two vampires by Feb. 1, 1600. A month later there would have been four, and so on...</em> </p><p> </p><p><font face="times new roman,times,serif" color="#000066" size="3">Do vampires have to turn others into vampires when they feed on them? I thought they could just feed on human blood. Killing the person but not always turning that person into a vampire.</font></p>
BeerBandit
10-27-2006, 10:52 AM
You're math is wrong. You're not counting the work of vampire slayers.<br />
Sheeplovr
10-27-2006, 10:52 AM
<p>yeah this is crap</p><p>this sounds like vampiry propaganda to get us to look the other way</p><p>"<font size="2" face="arial"><font face="arial">University of Central Florida</font></font>" </p><p>gees thats where science is</p><p> the middle of a state of retards</p><p> <br />
</p>
BeerBandit
10-27-2006, 11:14 AM
Also, I'm sure the vampires would know that if they "ate" all of the humans, they would then have no food, and would die out. There had to be some kind of internal population control.<br />
FUNKMAN
10-27-2006, 11:18 AM
<p><strong><font size="1">NEWSFLASH- Vampires Don't Exist!</font></strong> </p><p>that bites!</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>and sucks!</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>at the same time</p>
reillyluck
10-27-2006, 11:20 AM
<p>Oh yeah? well if vampires dont exsist, whats count chocula doing riding around with Frankenberry huh huh? </p><p>http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g21/mupirate/FrankenberryCountChoculaOnTheirWayT.jpg</p>
MadMatt
10-27-2006, 11:36 AM
<strong>Doctor Manhattan</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Patches</strong> wrote:<br /><p><em>...If the first vampire came into existence that day and bit one person a month, there would have been two vampires by Feb. 1, 1600. A month later there would have been four, and so on...</em> </p><p><font face="times new roman,times,serif" color="#000066" size="3">Do vampires have to turn others into vampires when they feed on them? I thought they could just feed on human blood. Killing the person but not always turning that person into a vampire.</font></p><p><font size="2">Exactly. Modern vampire mythology has interpreted vampirism as a "gift" that is only given to a select few. </font></p><p><font size="2">Humans are generally viewed as food (except for a special few) and are not always killed outright. A vampire can feed and leave a person alive - like harvesting the apples from an apple tree.</font> <font size="2">The tree (human) is still alive; it just has to make more apples (blood).</font></p>
FUNKMAN
10-27-2006, 11:38 AM
we could argue against this finding but i'm sure it would be in <strong>vein</strong>...
Doctor Manhattan
10-27-2006, 11:50 AM
<strong>MadMatt</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Doctor Manhattan</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Patches</strong> wrote:<br /><p><em>...If the first vampire came into existence that day and bit one person a month, there would have been two vampires by Feb. 1, 1600. A month later there would have been four, and so on...</em> </p><p><font face="times new roman,times,serif" color="#000066" size="3">Do vampires have to turn others into vampires when they feed on them? I thought they could just feed on human blood. Killing the person but not always turning that person into a vampire.</font></p><p><font size="2">Exactly. Modern vampire mythology has interpreted vampirism as a "gift" that is only given to a select few. </font></p><p><font size="2">Humans are generally viewed as food (except for a special few) and are not always killed outright. A vampire can feed and leave a person alive - like harvesting the apples from an apple tree.</font> <font size="2">The tree (human) is still alive; it just has to make more apples (blood).</font></p><p><font face="times new roman,times,serif" color="#000066" size="3">Ha. We just proved that Vampire <em>may</em> exisit. Fuck Costas Efthimiou, that guy's a retard!</font></p>
MadMatt
10-27-2006, 11:57 AM
<strong>Doctor Manhattan</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>MadMatt</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Doctor Manhattan</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>Patches</strong> wrote:<br /><p><em>...If the first vampire came into existence that day and bit one person a month, there would have been two vampires by Feb. 1, 1600. A month later there would have been four, and so on...</em> </p><p><font face="times new roman,times,serif" color="#000066" size="3">Do vampires have to turn others into vampires when they feed on them? I thought they could just feed on human blood. Killing the person but not always turning that person into a vampire.</font></p><p><font size="2">Exactly. Modern vampire mythology has interpreted vampirism as a "gift" that is only given to a select few. </font></p><p><font size="2">Humans are generally viewed as food (except for a special few) and are not always killed outright. A vampire can feed and leave a person alive - like harvesting the apples from an apple tree.</font> <font size="2">The tree (human) is still alive; it just has to make more apples (blood).</font></p><p><font face="times new roman,times,serif" color="#000066" size="3">Ha. We just proved that Vampire <em>may</em> exisit. Fuck Costas Efthimiou, that guy's a retard!</font></p><p><font size="3">Yeah, F-him! Right in his ear!</font></p><p><img height="148" src="http://www.freshlabs.de/journal/wp-content/pics/mythbusters.jpg" width="290" border="0" /></p>
PapaBear
10-27-2006, 01:24 PM
Beerbandit is right. There aren't nearly enough factors considered for this formula to be accurate.
badorties
10-27-2006, 01:31 PM
<strong>reillyluck</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Oh yeah? well if vampires dont exsist, whats count chocula doing riding around with Frankenberry huh huh? </p><p><img src="http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g21/mupirate/FrankenberryCountChoculaOnTheirWayT.jpg" border="0" /></p><p>aren't they the XM interns ...?</p>
Contra
10-28-2006, 12:26 PM
You guys are keeping my "Hot vampire chick lets me fuck the shit outta her and then feeds on me" fantasy alive!
<span class=post_edited>This message was edited by Contra on 10-28-06 @ 4:27 PM</span>
reillyluck
10-28-2006, 01:14 PM
<strong>badorties</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>reillyluck</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Oh yeah? well if vampires dont exsist, whats count chocula doing riding around with Frankenberry huh huh? </p><p><img src="http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g21/mupirate/FrankenberryCountChoculaOnTheirWayT.jpg" border="0" /></p><p>aren't they the XM interns ...?</p><p>my point EXACTLY...they really do exsist! Vampires have jobs too living normal lives! </p>
super turbo death shark
10-28-2006, 02:08 PM
<p>maybe humans just don't exist anymore<br /></p><p> </p><p>thats the conclusion i come up with when i read between the lines </p>
FUNKMAN
10-28-2006, 02:46 PM
<strong>Sharkmouth</strong> wrote:<br /><p>maybe humans just don't exist anymore<br /></p><p> </p><p>thats the conclusion i come up with when i read between the lines </p><p>oh they're human alright, but vampires at the same time. they'll suck your blood, the money out of your retirement account, and their own father's cock for a few extra bucks!</p><p><img height="129" src="http://us.news1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20061027/thumb.16803957371f4a8b96c252910d5e9823.flipping_on _the_boss_nybz105.jpg" width="88" border="0" /><img height="130" src="http://us.news1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20061027/thumb.c1dd39f08d7e4a5392ce486bc10a50ae.flipping_on _the_boss_nybz104.jpg" width="82" border="0" /><img height="92" src="http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/rids/20061023/t/r2608888131.jpg" width="130" border="0" /></p>
furie
10-28-2006, 04:17 PM
this only works if you go with the line that every bit yeilds a vampire(dracula rules). But what about lestat rules where one is made a vampire on purpose, not just a bite?
FUNKMAN
10-28-2006, 04:23 PM
<p>No Vampires, BULLSHIT!</p><p>the guy should go visit a rest stop and stick his doowang into a glory hole...</p>
lleeder
10-28-2006, 04:26 PM
What about werewolves has that been disproved as well<strong>?</strong>
reeshy
10-28-2006, 04:29 PM
I believe in vampires...My girlfriend sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br />
FUNKMAN
10-28-2006, 05:14 PM
<strong>reeshy</strong> wrote:<br />I believe in vampires...My girlfriend sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br /><p>on your binky?</p>
BeerBandit
10-28-2006, 06:22 PM
<p> </p><strong>lleeder</strong> wrote:<br />What about werewolves has that been disproved as well<strong>?</strong><p> </p><p> </p><p>I would actually believe the existence of werewolves to be disproven a little more easily. Keeping the same assumption as to the date of the original werewolve, they would be on the same werewolve generation schedule of every month, due to the monthly occurence of a full moon (with the slight exception of blue moons, of course). Also there is no choice involved in making a werewolf. You're bitten, you're a werewolf. And they are harder to kill seeing as they are only around for one night a month, and silver bullets are a little harder to come by than wooden stakes.<br /></p>
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.