View Full Version : Guns on the new World Trade Center
Dirtybird12
04-28-2006, 07:56 AM
<p>NEW YORK -- After months of disputes over the future of Ground Zero, state and city officials finally brought in the heavy equipment and began construction Thursday on the<a href="http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-wtc28.html" target="_self"> 1,776-foot Freedom Tower</a> that will rise on the World Trade Center site</p><p><font size="2"><strong>Do you think they should place anti-aircraft artillery on top of the Freedom Tower? </strong></font></p><p><img height="336" src="http://www.9thtexas.org/photos/1Real_Cannon_Corinth_Visitor_Center.jpg" width="448" border="0" /></p>
Judge Smails
04-28-2006, 08:01 AM
Even if you could work out the logistics of putting these guns on the building and having them manned 24/7 by trained personnel, I think that shooting down an aircraft over lower Manhattan would be likely to kill far more people than the attack on the original WTC did.
Furtherman
04-28-2006, 08:06 AM
<p>Are there guns on The Empire State Building?</p><p> </p><p>Exactly.</p>
suggums
04-28-2006, 08:07 AM
so now im rollin down rodeo with a shotgun<br />
Dirtybird12
04-28-2006, 08:25 AM
maybe a bubble gun could shoot a giant bubble around the plane ...or something.
<strong>Furtherman</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Are there guns on The Empire State Building?</p><p> </p><p>Exactly.</p><p>Are there defensive systems on the White House?</p><p>Oh wait...there are.</p>
FezPaul
04-28-2006, 09:49 AM
<strong>CircusFreak</strong> wrote:<br />maybe a bubble gun could shoot a giant bubble around the plane ...or something. <p>http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f281/FezPaul/bubblegun.gif</p>
<strong>CircusFreak</strong> wrote: <p><font size="2"><strong>Do you think they should place anti-aircraft artillery on top of the Freedom Tower? </strong></font></p><p><img height="336" src="http://www.9thtexas.org/photos/1Real_Cannon_Corinth_Visitor_Center.jpg" width="448" border="0" /></p><p>yeah, but there has to be some newer guns than the one in your picture</p>
Sheeplovr
04-28-2006, 10:06 AM
<p>does freedom tower mean french tower?</p><p>I thought freedom was code for french what happend to that </p>
kdubya
04-28-2006, 10:21 AM
They should have those lasers they have at the end of Flash Gordon, that way when they fire them off everyone just thinks its for Mings wedding
FUNKMAN
04-28-2006, 10:40 AM
<p>if you shoot a plane down it's just gonna land into some other building... </p><p>SURE! kill the other guy, real nice</p>
Recyclerz
04-28-2006, 11:01 AM
<p>Guns, guns, guns on the roof</p><p>Guns, guns, waiting to shoot</p><p><img height="300" src="http://www.cdquest.com/images/album_art/sorted/0074/6463/0074646388426.jpg" width="298" border="0" /></p><p> </p><p>Not particularly witty, admittedly, but I love The Clash.</p>
Terragen
04-28-2006, 11:02 AM
<p>Step 1: Impeach Bush</p><p>Step 2: Blow up the Middle East entirely<br />
</p><p> </p><p>No more danger! </p>
Doctor Manhattan
04-28-2006, 11:37 AM
<strong>SinA</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>CircusFreak</strong> wrote: <p><font size="2"><strong>Do you think they should place anti-aircraft artillery on top of the Freedom Tower? </strong></font></p><p><img height="168" src="http://www.9thtexas.org/photos/1Real_Cannon_Corinth_Visitor_Center.jpg" width="224" border="0" /></p><p>yeah, but there has to be some newer guns than the one in your picture</p><p><img src="http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/4909/bigguns5fs.jpg" border="0" /></p>
cougarjake13
04-29-2006, 02:27 PM
<strong>Terragen</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Step 1: Impeach Bush</p><p>Step 2: Blow up the Middle East entirely<br /></p><p> </p><p>No more danger! </p><p>whether or not we impeach bush doesnt matter we should still do step 2</p>
FezPaul
04-29-2006, 02:33 PM
<strong>Doctor Manhattan</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>SinA</strong> wrote:<br /><strong>CircusFreak</strong> wrote: <p><font size="2"><strong>Do you think they should place anti-aircraft artillery on top of the Freedom Tower? </strong></font></p><p><img height="168" src="http://www.9thtexas.org/photos/1Real_Cannon_Corinth_Visitor_Center.jpg" width="224" border="0" /></p><p>yeah, but there has to be some newer guns than the one in your picture</p><p><img src="http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/4909/bigguns5fs.jpg" border="0" /></p><p><font color="#990066" size="3"><em>He said newer not bigger, DocMan, That looks like WWII vintage.</em></font></p><p><font color="#990066" size="3"><em>Okay, it's newer than a Civil War cannon, but still.</em></font></p>
furie
04-29-2006, 05:14 PM
<hr color="cococo" align="left"></font><strong>Furtherman</strong> wrote:<br><p>Are there guns on The Empire State Building?</p><p> </p><p>Exactly.</p><hr color="cococo" align="left"><p></p>
will the freedom tower be built out of concrete, steel and marble?
exactly.
<span class=post_edited>This message was edited by furie on 4-29-06 @ 9:15 PM</span>
bitterbuffalo
04-30-2006, 12:04 AM
<p><img border="0" src="http://img56.imageshack.us/img56/9501/freedomtowergunz7hn.jpg" /></p>
Reephdweller
04-30-2006, 05:32 AM
Yup
jeffdwright2001
04-30-2006, 05:37 AM
<p>Somehow there'd be budgetary issues and we'd end up with someone like this manning the gun:</p><p><img title="Barney" height="240" alt="Barney" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/df/Knotts_as_Barnie.jpg" width="320" border="0" /></p><p>I'd vote no. </p>
CaptClown
04-30-2006, 05:48 AM
<strong>jeffdwright2001</strong> wrote:<br /><p>Somehow there'd be budgetary issues and we'd end up with someone like this manning the gun:</p><p><img title="Barney" height="240" alt="Barney" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/df/Knotts_as_Barnie.jpg" width="320" border="0" /></p><p>I'd vote no. </p><p>Does he get more than one shell?</p>
dymod
05-01-2006, 08:21 AM
Fuck yah and we should put em on the Statue of liberty. Get rid of that damn torch and put in a rocket launcher.<br />
Melrapuo
05-01-2006, 12:59 PM
<hr color="cococo" align="left"></font><strong>Terragen</strong> wrote:<br><p>Step 1: Impeach Bush</p><p>Step 2: Blow up the Middle East entirely<br />
</p><p>ÿ</p><p>No more danger!ÿ</p><hr color="cococo" align="left"><p></p>
<span class=post_edited>This message was edited by Melrapuo on 5-1-06 @ 5:00 PM</span>
NewYorkDragons80
05-01-2006, 01:58 PM
<p> Anti-Aircraft artillery offers no real protection from an
impending plane attack which intends to crash into the tower. The
best-case scenario would be if the artillery *possibly* shot out a
fuselage and burned out some of the gas seconds before it slammed into
the tower anyway<br />
</p><p> </p><p> </p><strong /><strong>Furtherman</strong> wrote:<br />
<p> </p><p> </p><p>Are there guns on The Empire State Building?</p><p> </p><p>Exactly.</p><p> </p><p> Maybe
not, but don't try to fly into the Chrysler Building after sundown,
cause this motherfucker will have something to say about it:</p><p><img width="240" height="335" border="0" src="http://www.preview-art.com/previews/09-2005/bg/TAM-Bourke-WhiteChryslerbg.jpg" /> </p><blockquote /><p> </p>
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.