You must set the ad_network_ads.txt file to be writable (check file name as well).
Review: Meet The Fockers [Archive] - RonFez.net Messageboard

Log in

View Full Version : Review: Meet The Fockers


Little Tony DeFranco
12-23-2004, 06:23 AM
Review: Meet the Fockers
http://www.browntownjohnny.com/index.php


Is it me or is the 'Ben Stiller' movie experience over with. Same character in every movie (except when he does cartoon comedies like 'Dodgeball' and 'Starsky and Hutch') as a schlep who is at odds with everything and everybody. Shame and humiliation are the agenda. "Something About.." and "Meet the Parents" had their game on, "Along Came Polly' and "Envy" were off the track. They were just knockoffs. "Meet the Fockers" is the awaited sequel to 'Parents' with co-star Robert DeNiro and returning director Jay (Austin P)Roach. I expected the follow-up to be in the ballpark but it's just an infield bunt (with an RBI). The down side is the tired Stiller antics, the plus side is adding Dustin Hoffman and Barbara Streisand as the title dad and mom. Same jokes with different spins, but the comic moments in part are pretty good, thanks to Roach's deft direction.

Takes place a few years after we last left Greg (Gaylord) Focker and Pam Byrnes (Teri Polo doesn't add much) are about to embark on a road trip with future in-laws Jack and Dina Byrnes (Bobby D and Blythe Danner) to Miami to meet the Fockers. In an armored RV and Jinxy the cat along with newborn baby Lil Jack (grandson of the other daughter), they try to make it work but the dominos are tumbling. The Focker Parents, Bernie (Hoffman) and Roz (Babs) are so far to the kookier Jewish left of Jack (ex-CIA with a 10 lb bug in his ass). Roz is a senior sex therapist and dad is a house husband with a healthy sex drive. Greg is falling apart when they spill the beans on every thing he every did in his life (including losing his cherry to the nanny). That's just a start to the humiliation. But we know where it will end up......happy marriage!

The script is the weak point here, depending too much on old bits like a leg-humping dog and pratfalls (Dustin is over 60...not funny). Jacks obsession with baby training is the main center of the conflict (a strap in breast feeder is a good gag) along with The Fockers 'touchy-feely' nature. The movie depends on the talent of it's cast members, and it delivers the goods. Hoffman and Streisand have never worked together before so it is giddy to watch them (both are great comic performers). DeNiro and Hoffman are old pros (together in 'Wag the Dog') and it's magical. Worth the price to see Dustin eating whipped cream off of Babs tits! Good improv works. Lil Jack gets the better laughs (Roach does wonders with this kid....with some CGI mouth work). Not as tight as the 'Parents' but the laughs are there in parts, and the film takes the 'way too silly' route. Yer Call!


Heartbeat is a Love Beat

Furtherman
12-23-2004, 06:31 AM
Save your money - it is on par with the first movie. It has its moments, but it also has long stretches of not funny. Dustin Hoffman is the highlight - going over the top to get the most laughs. But it is the same premise of the first movie. DeNiro is suspicious and uses his hidden cameras and hijinx ensue! Barbra Streisand was funnier in Yentil.

Wait for it to be on cable - which won't be long.

<IMG SRC="http://www.chaoticconcepts.com/randomizer/random.php?uid=7">
...with thanks to JustJon

NewYorkDragons80
12-23-2004, 07:49 AM
Save your money - it is on par with the first movie.
The first definitely has its share of detractors, but for me, being on par with the first is a good thing. I would have much higher expectations for this one if Jerry Stiller was Greg's father.

<marquee>
"To insist on strength is not war-mongering. It is peace-mongering." -Senator Barry M. Goldwater "If gold should rust, what will iron do?" -Geoffrey Chaucer "Worship him, I beg you, in a way that is worthy of thinking beings.-Romans 12:1</marquee>
<img src=http://members.aol.com/cityhawk80/images/nydragonssig.bmp?mtbrand=AOL_US>

Reephdweller
12-23-2004, 09:41 AM
I would have much higher expectations for this one if Jerry Stiller was Greg's father.



I thought the very same thing. I don't get it why they wouldn't concieve the concept of having his father in the role. My assumption from there was that this movie just wasn't well thought out.

<center><IMG SRC="http://www.chaoticconcepts.com/randomizer/random.php?uid=3">
Reefy's website... (http://www.osirusonline.com/)</center>
<font size="1" color="red">
<center>Check out The Ron and Fez Show Logs...UPDATED!!!!! (http://www.osirusonline.com/ronfez.htm)</center>
<marquee behavior=alternate bgcolor="#FFFFFF">Right now you could care less about me...
but soon enough you will care, by the time I'm done</marquee> </font>

NewYorkDragons80
12-23-2004, 09:55 AM
Well, they were seriously considering it. In fact, I was expecting Jerry until I saw the trailer with Dustin Hoffman. I'm still going to see it, though.

<marquee>
"To insist on strength is not war-mongering. It is peace-mongering." -Senator Barry M. Goldwater "If gold should rust, what will iron do?" -Geoffrey Chaucer "Worship him, I beg you, in a way that is worthy of thinking beings.-Romans 12:1</marquee>
<img src=http://members.aol.com/cityhawk80/images/nydragonssig.bmp?mtbrand=AOL_US>

grlNIN
12-23-2004, 10:04 AM
I thought the very same thing. I don't get it why they wouldn't concieve the concept of having his father in the role. My assumption from there was that this movie just wasn't well thought out.


I'm sure it was thrown on the table at one point or another during casting but it seems a little too obvious to everyone involved and the movie goer that they would do something like that. Maybe that's why movie companies and the casting directors avoid pairing parents and children up alot?

Plus, having Jerry Stiller in the sequel would be painful, about as painful as watching Deniro in We're No Angels.

<br>
<br><center><img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=ninny">
<br>Then throughout the day mankind played with grenades</center>

mikeyboy
12-23-2004, 10:23 AM
I'm sure it was thrown on the table at one point or another during casting but it seems a little too obvious


Agreed. We've already seen Jerry Stiller acting as Ben Stiller's dad on TV in various things. Why do something that's already been done?

<img src="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=mikeyboy">
Ron & Fez Show Log (http://www.osirusonline.com/ronfez.htm); Daily News Scratch N' Match is the Devil
Just because you don't listen doesn't mean I don't have a radio show
The Music Mikey Likes Show on RadioBBQ, weekdays 12-2 (http://www.radiobbq.net)