42nd-delay
12-15-2004, 09:56 AM
Am I the only one who noticed that Bush awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom to George Tenet, Paul Bremer and Tommy Franks for their roles as the architects of the Iraq policy? Or perhaps I'm the only one a bit mystified by this?
First off, it might be asked why is the highest civilian award for distinguished civilian service in peacetime going to three people for their service in wartime (or at the very least in a warzone that's no longer offically a war)? Even if it can be contended that Bremer's time in Iraq was after the conflict officially ended, Franks and Bremer certainly served during the war, and Franks in a distinctly non-civilian capacity.
Futhermore, why are these medals being awarded so soon after the events cited as the exemplary service (apparently, the shortest time in the history of the award)? Surely less than two years is not long enough to deem whether something this big has been a success.
But the big question is, of course, why are they getting the award for something that is currently and decidedly not a success? I can only assume it's an effort by the Bush administration to convince the public that it has been a success, the circular logic being... if the three architects of the Iraq policy are Medal of Freedom winners, the policy must have been a success. So let's give them the award!
Either that, or Bush is really deluded about the reality of the situation. Or about what the award is supposed to be awarded for. Or he doesn't care.
An article (http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20041215/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_medal_of_freedom_7) about it.
------------------------------
<img src="http://www.thewalkons.com/bluestates_sig.jpg">
"42nd-delay is the only person who's making sense." - Ron, 3-12-02
First off, it might be asked why is the highest civilian award for distinguished civilian service in peacetime going to three people for their service in wartime (or at the very least in a warzone that's no longer offically a war)? Even if it can be contended that Bremer's time in Iraq was after the conflict officially ended, Franks and Bremer certainly served during the war, and Franks in a distinctly non-civilian capacity.
Futhermore, why are these medals being awarded so soon after the events cited as the exemplary service (apparently, the shortest time in the history of the award)? Surely less than two years is not long enough to deem whether something this big has been a success.
But the big question is, of course, why are they getting the award for something that is currently and decidedly not a success? I can only assume it's an effort by the Bush administration to convince the public that it has been a success, the circular logic being... if the three architects of the Iraq policy are Medal of Freedom winners, the policy must have been a success. So let's give them the award!
Either that, or Bush is really deluded about the reality of the situation. Or about what the award is supposed to be awarded for. Or he doesn't care.
An article (http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20041215/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_medal_of_freedom_7) about it.
------------------------------
<img src="http://www.thewalkons.com/bluestates_sig.jpg">
"42nd-delay is the only person who's making sense." - Ron, 3-12-02