You must set the ad_network_ads.txt file to be writable (check file name as well).
Brand split- 2 years later- a good or bad thing? [Archive] - RonFez.net Messageboard

PDA

View Full Version : Brand split- 2 years later- a good or bad thing?


skent00
09-15-2004, 05:13 AM
In my opinion since the split of the 2 brands, the company has gone downhill. Not only do you have to wait an entire week for part of an exciting story line to unfold, but the excitement and surprise is gone.

With specific wrestlers assigned to each show, storylines and fueds are stale and limited and you know who you are going to see each and every week. As with no assignments to any particular show, there is the surprise factor of wondering who and what am I going to see on this show this week.

I think that recombining the shows would greatly improve ratings and liven up PPV's. Look at it this way. For the first couple of months alone you could have tournaments or whatever to combine the heavyweight and tag team titles which would be very exciting. You can keep both the US and Intco. titles, this way you have each wrestler with the ability to attempt at any of the 6 titles availible.

This equals more opportunity and more lively PPV's and ratings. What does everyone else think?

Teenweek
09-15-2004, 05:18 AM
I think eventually they should put the 2 back together but now is not the time. They need to create new talent. Guys like Cena, Shelton Benjamin, batista, Randy Orton are the future of WWE. Some trades would be good though.

skent00
09-15-2004, 05:24 AM
But don't you think that the ability to be on 2 shows in 1 week might greatly improve their skills and popularity levels?

Not everyone has cable television and is able to see all the up and coming stars that may be on RAW.

WNEWstinks
09-15-2004, 06:10 AM
It's been GREAT. Look if they were still all in one brand the main eventers would still be the same as 2 years ago. The younger talent would still be mid-carders.

Do you think Eddie,Benoit,Orton, Ray jr. Mr. Benjamin would be the main eventers? No, they would have gotten killed by hhh,goldberg,brock,big show in the past 2 years.

It's good because we got new stars because more air time was made.

hatetreehighway
09-15-2004, 08:40 AM
DONT WORRY THE BIG SHIT WILL BE THE NEXT BIG THANG. AND GO RIGHT FOR THE TITLE...

PATHETIC...
CENA-BOOKER-EDDIE-RVD...
SHOULD BE AT WWE TITLE LINES.
I KNOW EDDIE HAS BUT AFTER ANGLE STORYLINE HE PROB GOES MIDCARD.....

Teenweek
09-15-2004, 08:49 AM
RVD sucks and is nothing but a glorified midcarder

ChickenHawk
09-15-2004, 08:58 AM
Everyone knows that wrestling died when McMahon bought everyone out. That's just the way it is, and the wrestling industry (aka - McMahon) will have to pay for it for the remainder of its lowly existence.

<IMG SRC="http://scripts.cgispy.com/image.cgi?u=ChickenHawk">
HORDE KING FOREVER!!! ORACLE NEVER!!!
<strike>Shock</strike>
<marquee behavior=alternate><font size=2><b>EMFA</b></font></marquee>[color=white]

SpicyMcHaggis
09-15-2004, 10:19 AM
Like ChickenHawk said, WWE needs competition, and until TNA gets that primetime spot on FX they've been dreaming about, WWE won't have to worry about what the fans want because there aren't any other real choices to pick from.

"And I never will play the Wild Rover no more."