Ok, lemme just shoot down Johnee's little theory on RVD as being a champ first.
Saying that RVD "isn't the best" is a joke! The god honest truth as you, I and every wrestling observer with half a brain knows is that RVD is the best performe the WWE have today. Hands down! Even though he is only 6'0", he still puts on one hell of a show and makes opponents like Triple H look good, which is darn near difficult to do. I won't even bring up the fact that he toned down a lot since ECW when he injured himself and is yet still the best in the business. Just because he isn't "big" doesn't mean people wouldn't believe he's the best. Come on, HE PROVES HE'S THE BEST IN EVERY ONE ON ONE MATCH.
With that being said I'll bring up, "the real LAME Brock Lesnar". I'll begin by stating the facts: his move set is unbelievably limited to where you can count all his possible moves on one hand which are the body press, over head belly to belly, and the F-5. TELL ME WHAT ELSE DOES HE DO? Lesnar has little to no mic skills, and his acting flat out sucks. Sure he has his night were he sells it to you, but it's not consistent. the only reason why he's uppercard is because, DUH, HE'S FREAKIN HUGE! When will you people understand that the WWE pushes guys who are big in height or muscular definition than those with real talent. I mean, look at Kevin Nash. He's almost a friggin giant and he's gettin push even though he moves like a chair in the ring with a move set that has to options, the big boot, or the powerbomb. They could've at least told him to do the jack-knife powerbomb so it looks a little more dramatic.
With this said, I'll quickly get backon topic and close by saying, Shane Douglas would be better. Triple H is way too sloppy and unoriginal to entertain me.
<IMG SRC="http://tseery.homestead.com/files/thejynx2.JPG">
Aggrivating the Mod's, one post at a tim